The constitutional court has suspended the payment of this tax on operations in which losses are recorded. A judicial hell is coming for those affected the government does not intend to eliminate or review the agreements with the holy see the best mortgage today for you new homes for new tenants updated: the city councils draw up Colombia Phone Number List a strategy to avoid the return of the 8,000 million collected for capital gains on the sale of homes. They will deny the claims to delay the refund to those affected who have paid this tax, and which the constitutional court has just suspended, in case they register losses in the operation. The constitutional court has decided that the tax on the increase in the value of urban land, known as the municipal capital gains tax, is unconstitutional .
Or, at least, it is when there is no real profit, that is, a capital gain. After the explosion of the real estate bubble and the serious economic crisis, properties began to lose value significantly, causing many purchase and sale operations to end in capital losses for the seller. However, the public administration and, specifically, the city councils, which are the ones that collect this tax, have continued to demand their share in these operations. The set of local administrations collected, according to the settlement of the budgets, more thawhich makes this tax one of the most important for the consistories . The total sum of these 8,000 million will not be reclaimable , since not all taxed sales were closed with losses.

Delay the return up to two years furthermore, the state considers, in principle, that this ruling is not extensible to the rest of the country . He defends that it only affects guipúzcoa, where the ruling known last friday is limited, which has its own regional regime thus, as el confidencial digital has learned , the treasury designs a plan with the municipalities to delay the reimbursement of amounts collected for non-existent capital gains for up to two years . Under this strategy, local governments will systematically deny all claims. This circumstance will force the affected person to go to the economic-administrative court and, subsequently, to the superior court of justice of their autonomous community.