NATO is not an army, nor does it have its own army. NATO military forces are only contributions from the armed forces of member countries. At the NATO level, there are only command structures and some joint structures, but NATO's strength is the gathering of the individual powers of the member countries in the field of defense. Surge in Measles Cases in UK Comes Amid Plummeting Vaccination Rate Keep .
Watching And this "collective Botswana Email List security" really puts the smaller countries in a good position, because they, being members of the Alliance, gain protection from the largest military power in the world. However, NATO has decided as a common goal that each member country must allocate at least 2% of the Gross Domestic Product for defense. Although all countries have made progress towards achieving this goal, there are still a large number of countries that have not respected this obligation. And this is where the problem lies with member countries not respecting their obligations, not because they "don't pay for NATO" as Trump says.
They should not pay for NATO, but they should strengthen their own military forces. And if they weren't in NATO, they would have to invest even more and they wouldn't have even close to the security they have as countries of the Alliance. And here the Americans are right when they demand that the European allies in NATO invest more in defense and in this way, strengthen the Euro-Atlantic collective defense. At the moment, they are far, far away, as evidenced by the latest figures published by NATO.