This expert emphasizes that no one should be fooled. “The strengths and benefits that these technological tools provide are not without risks . Technology is neutral in itself, but it is not the use that is made of it, how it is programmed, the type of teaching or algorithm that is applied to it.”
“At the end of the day, it is about establishing a framework of people's rights around AI . Legislators know this and are working on legislation focused on the Email Data responsibility of creators from design and by default. After all, the AESIA will also have sanctioning powers, so it is time for companies to start doing risk analysis,” he comments.
“From this perspective this also brings up the intimate relationship of the regulation of AI and the AESIA with the protection of personal data and the AEPD . There are many similarities in the approaches of both regulations and they are closely related to the extent to which Artificial Intelligence tools can have a very large and profound implication on privacy and the rights and freedoms of people. Thus, it is important to expect rapport between both agencies in cases where there are common elements,” comments this expert.
Judel recalls that “I think it is important to highlight that privacy professionals are fundamental elements to help with regulatory compliance with artificial intelligence. In fact, many of us have been working on reactive machines, on all types of algorithms focused on e-commerce or social networks or more specific elements of digital marketing such as machine learning for a long time,” she highlights.
Remember that from the Spanish Professional Privacy Association (APEP) “we are already working on training programs to provide knowledge and skills to our professionals, providing them with opportunities to continue at the forefront of advising technology companies, especially in the face of the revolution that is yet to come. ”.